AMERICAN RIVER
WATERSHED GROUP
July 15, 2004
-
- The meeting of the American
River Watershed Group (ARWG) meeting was called to order by Rich
Gresham, Placer County Resource Conservation District (PCRCD) at
10:15 a.m. at Placer County Water Agency’s “American
River Room” located at 144 Ferguson Road, Auburn.
- Present:
Rich Gresham, PCRCD District Manager, Stan MacDonald and Stewart
Feldman PCRCD Directors, and Katie Maloney, PCRCD Sr. Admin.
Assistant; Kevin Roberts, Sierra Pacific Industries (SPI) Biologist;
Ed Horton, Placer County Water Agency (PCWA); Rich Johnson USFS
Foresthill District Ranger; Cliff Heitz, Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) District Conservationist; Mark Egbert,
El Dorado County & Georgetown Divide RCDs; Marilyn Jasper,
Clover Valley Foundation and Sierra Club; Gary Palhegyi, GeoSyntec
Consulting; Bob Fratini, Pacific, Gas, & Electric; Liz
Mansfield, El Dorado Irrigation District Watershed Coordinator; Bill
Templin, American River Watershed Coordinator; Tom Amesbury, Sierra
Forest Communities Institute.
- Subcommittee Reports:
-
Placer County Fire Safe Alliance
(Alliance):
- Rich Gresham reported that
although there is no longer funding for an Alliance Coordinator, the
Alliance remains active and is reviewing its future mission, role,
and structure.
- Stewart
Feldman reported that July 21st a consortium of fire
entities will be exploring fire safe activities in the Granite Bay
area.
- Rich Johnson noted the
importance of fire safe collaboration and encouraged continuation of
Alliance efforts. He stressed the importance of establishing
evacuation routes and shaded fuel break strategies when developing
community fire safe plans and noted their lack in the documents he
has reviewed.
- Stewart reported the Placer
County Hazard Mitigation Committee is holding meeting under the
direction of their Office of Emergency Services (OES) and that Robin
Yonash has been providing the committee with pertinent information.
- Rich Johnson stressed the
importance of the county developing a plan in collaboration with the
Foresthill, Iowa Hill, and other forest communities.
-
- Rich Gresham noted the need for
OES, the Fire Chiefs Association, and the Alliance to develop a good
fire safe plan with components that address evacuation, fire safe
strategies, and public education and outreach efforts. He requested
that Rich Johnson participate in the Alliance effort. He noted that
pertinent information, already been collected, has been passed on to
the county for use in their planning efforts.
- Project Updates:
- Rich Gresham reported the
contract is under review by attorneys at the state level before it
can be sent to Sierra College for review then back to the state for
final approval. All four prospective project candidates have been
updated as to the status of the project and all four are still
interested in the project.
-
- Business:
-
Introduction
of Bill Templin, American River Watershed Coordinator:
- Bill Templin introduced himself
and reviewed his background that includes having worked for US
Geological Survey. Bill has a strong background in water issues and
he passed around a press release meant to introduce himself and his
new coordination effort to the watershed’s communities.
- Bill reported he has been
attempting to meet with stakeholders individually and is
familiarizing himself with his workplan that will guide his efforts
for the next three years. Bill passed around copies of a PowerPoint
presentation and a tri-fold pamphlet he has developed outlining his
workplan to help stakeholders understand the goals and objectives of
his effort. He stressed he is working to develop a network of
contacts and a list of potential projects.
- Rich Gresham reported there is a
plan to place regular updates in the media to publicize ARWG
efforts. The group shared media contact information with Bill.
-
- Rich requested ARWG members make
time to meet with Bill, get acquainted, and discuss with him their
issues of concern.
- Pacific Gas &Electric
(PG&E) Watershed Lands Management Plans & Divestitures:
- Rich Gresham introduced Bob
Fratini of PG&E and stressed the PG&E divestiture could
provide project and restoration opportunities both within and
outside of the watershed.
- Bob Fratini reviewed the PG&E
Settlement Agreement and Land Conservation Agreement including the
following points:
-
- Key factors in the energy crisis
-
deregulation began 1996
- divestiture of utility owned
generation
-
utility required to procure all of
their power from spot market and prevented from signing long term
contracts
-
rapid demand growth/low supply
-
high wholesale prices (supply/demand
imbalance, high gas prices, poor market design) resulted in rolling
blackouts
-
frozen retail prices (1996 levels)
average 16 cents per kilowatt hour profit
-
PG&E files bankruptcy under
Chapter 11
-
by January 2001 PG&E losing $2M
per hour
-
unsuccessfully sought regulatory
relief
-
credit rating dropped to junk bond
status
- Highlights of Settlement
Agreement
-
Settlement reached December 18, 2003
-
pays back creditors in full with
interest
-
did not require a rate increase
-
did not need taxpayer bail-out
-
PG&E remains a vertically
integrated utility
-
restores credit worthiness
-
dismissal of litigation
- Preservation/environmental
enhancement of PG&E watershed lands
- 140K acres of watershed lands
-
95K of these are tied to hydro
projects & regulated through FERC re-licensing process
-
7,962 acres located in Placer County
- Bob reviewed locations of
watershed lands, land conservation commitments, and public use
facilities. Permanent conservation easements/FEE Simple donations
would restrict development and protect/preserve/enhance beneficial
public values.
- Donations would be made to
organizations whose ownership will ensure protection of beneficial
public values and might include public entities and qualified
non-profit conservation organizations. Lands required for
hydroelectric operations are excluded from consideration for FEE
simple donation.
- The process for the easement and
land donation plan includes PG&E, Pacific Forest & Watershed
Lands Stewardship Council (Stewardship Council), CA Public Utilities
Commission (CPUC), FERC, and other regulatory bodies.
-
- The Stewardship Council will
recommend conservation objectives and develop criteria for ultimate
land disposition, implementation, and monitoring plans. The
Stewardship Council governing board includes among others the
following members:
-
CPUC
-
CA Resources Agency
-
Office Ratepayers Advocates
-
Regional Council of Rural Counties
-
Central Valley Regional Water
Quality Control Board
- Trust for Public Lands
-
- The
Stewardship Council will make decisions by consensus (non-objection)
if consensus can not be reached, arbitration will ensue. Additional
information can be found on PGE’s website at: www.pge.com
.
- Bob fielded questions from the
group and noted that as the Stewardship Council forms and moves
forward they will be interacting with the public.
- Rich Gresham noted the PG&E
divestiture has been brought to the attention of the CA Association
of Resource Conservation District’s (CARCD’s) Forestry &
Fuels Management Committee and Bob will be making a presentation to
the committee at their next meeting.
- Rich reviewed opportunities for
partnering on projects and conservation planning, including a
proposed project to build upon restoration efforts already
implemented by the /Granite Bay Flycasters at PG&E owned Bear
Valley Meadow by restoring the stream’s meander through the
meadow.
- Bob Fratini indicated he will
keep the group abreast of developments and the group thanked Bob for
his presentation.
- Overview of Environmental
Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) Practices within the American
River Watershed:
- Cliff Heitz apologized for
missing the last two meetings due to his workload that included
getting current EQIP projects underway.
-
- Cliff distributed background
information on Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
programs. NRCS resulted from the restructuring of the Soil
Conservation Service to expand its programs past assistance to
commodity crop growers.
- In the past, assistance for
private forest landowners was addressed through the Forest
Incentives Program, administered by NRCS, but restricted by limited
funding that addressed only production issues.
- The early 1990’s brought
about program changes in the Farm Bill and resulted in the inception
of EQIP. The new program allowed for a wide variety of practices to
meet resource needs including water, soil, air, plants, and animals.
- Cliff reviewed past efforts of
ARWG member and PCRCD Director Stan MacDonald to address fire safety
issues and fuels reduction by chairing the “Local Working
Group” that helps guide the local EQIP effort.
- The “healthy forest/fuel
load reduction” component of EQIP first started in Meadow
Vista in conjunction with the development of a watershed plan for
that specific community. One of the major resource concerns
identified in that document included the health of forestland and
the threat of wildfires. This effort also resulted in the use of
the term “healthy forest”. A few years later the
healthy forest/fuel load reduction efforts were expanded to include
a Foresthill Road “healthy forest’ demonstration site
and the Michigan Bluff Shaded Fuel Break.
-
- Implementation funding for
healthy forest practices in the county this year will be around
$470K. These practices include brush clearing, tree thinning,
limbing, forest re-planting, wildlife enhancement, watering, erosion
control, and invasives management. In the last five years
approximately $1.150K from EQIP and $60K from Prop 204 funding has
been spent on private forestlands in the county. Landowners have
contributed an additional $415K to on-the-ground projects for a
total of $1.625K spent on private forestlands. The majority of
this funding has been spent within the American River watershed.
-
- Rich thanked Cliff for the
information and suggested that it would be helpful if the group had
a GIS map depicting where EQIP projects are being implemented.
- Open Discussion:
- Liz Mansfield El Dorado
Irrigation District Watershed Coordinator informed the group of the
plan to develop an internet-based “Watershed Portal” for
a region that would include the Consumnes River, American River, and
Bear River watersheds. She expressed the desire to partner with
coordinators of these watersheds in an effort to move the idea of
developing the “Watershed Portal” forward. The portal
will provide a central location from which pertinent watershed
information can be disseminated and shared. Liz is working on
developing a presentation regarding the idea and requested time on
the agenda to present the idea in a more formal manner next month.
- Rich Gresham asked members to
identify two topics they would like to hear more about and one topic
they would like to share with the group in the future. Please being
ideas to next month’s meeting for further discussion.
- Next Meeting and Adjournment:
- The
next meeting will take place on August 19th. The meeting
was adjourned at 12:15 p.m.